An Tir Culture Wiki:Community Portal

Community discussions are held here.

Announcements

A&S (Primarily S) on Wiki

I've had a query from Hucbald, the new Sciences deputy for Tir Righ, asking if it would be possible to use the Wiki as a repository for sciences-related documents. I've replied in the affirmative, and warned him about the copyright and "anyone can edit" issues. We'll iron out a few details and (hopefully) you should see the Sciences content of our pages blossom. --Elizabeth Braidwood 14:06, 17 Jul 2007 (EDT)

Head's Up: Officer Badge Images

I noticed that over Christmas Mistress Yolande uploaded small images of most of the officer badges. Feel free to use them. --Elizabeth Braidwood 10:15, 17 Jan 2007 (PST)

OP Adds Links to Wiki

(Maintaining the Wiki's history, as well as the Kingdom's)

From: Jacyntha
Date: 2006-08-16 14:00

Greetings unto Their Majesties, King Amalric and Queen Caia
And to Their Highnesses of the Summits, Prince Tjorkill and Princess Sylva
And to Their Highnesses of Avacal, Prince Wernar and Princess Tatiana
And to Their Highnesses of Tir Righ, Prince Kheron and Princess Ksenia
And to all of the other gentles here gathered

From Duchess Jacyntha Argentarius, Dexter Gauntlet Herald

It pleases me to notify you of a major change in the An Tir Order of Precedence.

When you look at the Roster Pages to an individual's listing you will notice that there is now a link to that person's An Tir Wiki page! Please take some time and add thoughts and memories to your page and your friend's pages. Let's make the Wiki be representative of this, the greatest Kingdom in the Knowne World.

My warmest regards,

Jacyntha
Jacyntha Argentarius, Duchess An Tir
Dexter Gauntlet Herald
Kingdom of An Tir

http://www.antirheralds.org/awards/OP/op.html

Wiki Work

Want to help, but don't know where to begin? Here are some good places to start:

• Pages that need more content
• Pages that need some cleanup
• Pages that need to be created
• Wiki Work (Read about this page in "Discussions" below).
• Templates

An Tir Wiki Opens its Doors

29 Aug 2005. Somebody write that down. I know I wish I'd written down the day the Steps list was first created. --Elizabeth Braidwood 23:43, 29 Aug 2005 (EDT)

Kudos

From time-to-time, I get complimented on the An Tir Wiki and although I always reply that I'm not the only one doing the work, you're not getting to see the compliments that are coming our way. So I'm going to post them here for all to share. --Elizabeth Braidwood 17:53, 25 Jul 2006 (EDT)

---

25 July 2006

I would also like to thank you, and the rest of the people who are working so hard on this project. You've all done a tremendous job.

Thank you, Brighid

---

I would also like to say that everyone is doing a fantastic job here on the wiki!!! I can't believe the community we have here in an tir. Great work everyone! Huzah! -Komatsu no Ayame / October 19th 2006

Discussions

Events

I'd like us to discuss how Events are organized.

It was originally set up so that events that repeat every year each had a parent page that contained a list of the individual (year-to-year) events. For example: Category:Events > Clinton War > Clinton War XXXIV/1999 Only the parent page was included in the Event Category.

Now I see that Malkom1366 has done an awesome amount of work, adding the Event Category to all the individual event pages as well. I'm of two minds about that -- while it's kinda nice to see all the individual events listed, they're not sorted into chronological order (they're sorted alphabetically by roman numeral) which makes it harder to find a particular event. And part of me doesn't like to see all the individual events listed -- it makes the page messy to look at and harder to find a particular event.

I'm not particularly crazy about the new Practice and Business Meeting sub-categories, although I can see how having this information on open-access wiki pages would keep them more up-to-date than branch web pages, which tend to be neglected. But I really do feel that the information should be included on the branch pages, rather than on individual event pages. (They're not really events.) I do feel strongly that the personal contact information should be posted only with the express permission of the person involved.

What do you think:

• Should the individual event pages be included on the category page? (If so, how to sort chronologically?)
• Should the Practice and Business meetings be included in the Events category or on the Branch pages?

--Elizabeth Braidwood 10:12, 20 Jul 2008 (PDT)

---

If it's less messy, the business meetings and practices, etc. could be part of their own subcategories of the events category and not a part of the events category itself, which would keep them from showing on the list of events, but you could still get to them by going to the subcategory page. Part of my reasoning for establishing pages for these things is that if someone wants to find a fight practice, they can do so without having to search through the branch pages for each branch. A single page can list all of the available activities around the kingdom of the same type.

Quite a few of the event pages already had the events tag on them, so I was really just trying to be consistent by adding it to the ones that seemed to be missing it. I'm always happy to help with fleshing out pages, but if I'm overcategorizing, just let me know and I can tone it down a bit. Categories just make parsing and sorting information so much easier. --Malkom1366/José Cabrera de Castilla

PS: I've avoided posting any personal information that wasn't already included on the page that I copied the info from. I went around to branch websites and tried to find current info on their recurring meetings and practices, and if there was enough info and consistency (beyond "contact so-and-so if you want to be part of this") I copied their existing verbage into the template I made for it.

---

We've got a catch-22 with the Events listing. If we have a recurring event, and only put the Events/War/ect listing for the main page (like Clinton War), then the individual years are listed in the Uncategorized page. We almost need a category called Categorized or something, just to remove them from the Uncategorized page, while not filling up the Events/War/ect pages. -- Phelan Tolusmidr 23:46, 6 Jan 2009 (PST)

---

Venue for Active Discussion

Are issues being addressed via this page in a timely manner, or would it be more useful to use the "An Tir Wiki" Yahoo group/list? We (Banjo, Keriji and I) set up the Yahoo group at the very beginning to help us get started. It's been languishing. We would welcome all active wiki-worker types for some active discussions to help reach consensus on the directions the wiki should take. --Elizabeth Braidwood 10:12, 20 Jul 2008 (PDT)

Elizabeth, the Yahoo Group seems to be set to totally private, so a non-member of the group opening the page is told that they aren't allowed to view the group (and thus, cannot follow a link to join it). If you'll change the status of the Yahoo group, I'll gladly join. --José Cabrera de Castilla 11:59, 21 Jul 2008 (PDT)

May I suggest a page link on the events page that says practices and then just put all the practices on one page? Also, if a page gets updated for dates on the individual page (for the principality, barony, shire, canton, college...etc..) will that not make it so that it automatically gets updated for every thing else if you have a page that links all the practices together???? (I admit I am not exactly tech savy on this it just makes sense to me that it would automatically update if the branch information was updated then shouldn't it update the page you create...?)--Eireannach 14:59, 20 Oct 2009 (PDT)Eireannach inghean ui Guindhe

Royalty

The way this section is set up seems chaotic I think because it first is done by couples, which is the first complication since there are a number who have different partners from reign to reign, then its organized by reigns leaving the couples page fairly blank and then on top of it there isnt much info on individual Royals themnselves. My suggestion would be to do away with the whole pair of people and organize the Royalty into the seperate reigns (which might have interesting synergy with the OP) and then link to the names of the people themselves, the pair of royals pages seem redundant.--P. Darius Corvinus (Corvyn) 03:04, 21 May 2006 (EDT)

Ideally, the reigns should appear in the order they ocurred, no? Like on http://www.antir.sca.org/Pubs/royalty.html. Is there any way to add a category:royalty tag that would do that? -- sort the reign by date? Or would the main royalty page have to be built by hand? --Elizabeth Braidwood 11:49, 23 May 2006 (EDT)

I've polled a few knowledgeable folks about their preferences on the layout of the Royalty page. So far all three have liked the ordered-by-name arrangement. One said it was easier to find a given reign, another said that there were already two versions of the chronological list and having a different list was nice. FWIW. --Elizabeth Braidwood 19:06, 22 Jun 2006 (EDT)

(While I'm editing this page anyway...) I've added a reign-order template to the Royalty of Tir Righ. Feel free to use/install it on other royalty. (I intend to do this myself eventually, but would be delighted if someone else felt moved to do it.) See Kheron I and Ksenia I for a sample. --Elizabeth Braidwood 10:15, 17 Jan 2007 (PST)

Images Policy

There's a query about our images policy over in Talk:Riderless_Horse_Ceremony. Anybody have any comments? --Elizabeth Braidwood 13:47, 16 May 2006 (EDT)

Wiki Work

At Corvyn's suggestion (we had a great f2f talk at Investiture this past weekend; thanks to Sir Yusuf for introducing us), I'm going to post raw wiki data in a page called Wiki Work. This data needs to be distributed to the appropriate pages with the appropriate mark-up. Do as much as you can, when you can. If we all contribute bits, the work will get done. --Elizabeth Braidwood 13:47, 15 May 2006 (EDT)

Wiki/OP Connection

Corvyn also suggested that we build a connection between the OP and the Wiki -- essentially a button on the OP next to a person's entry that will create a default person page on the Wiki, complete with template. Just fill in the blanks. It was Corvyn's idea. Yusuf will be contacting Krenn and working with Quentin to set up the details. It's very cool. --Elizabeth Braidwood 13:47, 15 May 2006 (EDT)

Templates

One thing I was noticing is incoherency a little. I think it would be swell if we put some collective effort into templates for various page types. Right now the only one I have found, although I havnt spent an increadable amount of time looking, is an event template and so all these different pages about similar topics are sorta chaotic. This could potentialy be daunting to new users or even just curious people looking for information.

Some examples of templates im talking about are like People, Events(done already Im pretty sure), Awards(for these ones we cant reprint what is already on the An Tir web site but would we be able to give at least summaries on them, also histories would be wicked(for example explaining the chains and spurs and belt of a knight)), Branches etc.

Tell me what you think :D --P. Darius Corvinus (Corvyn) 23:44, 14 May 2006 (EDT)

You can find a link to a list of Templates at the bottom of Wiki_Editing_Help. Not the most intuitively obvious place, I agree. Go ahead and add a link in a more obvious place. --Elizabeth Braidwood 13:47, 15 May 2006 (EDT)

Oh there they are but there are a few that are not there that would be good to have like People or Awards or Positions/Offices--P. Darius Corvinus (Corvyn) 02:56, 21 May 2006 (EDT)

Got any templates you like from other wikis or have designed yourself? Add them. --Elizabeth Braidwood 11:50, 23 May 2006 (EDT)

I created a new branch template. I'd like others to take a look at it and see what they think. Template:BranchTemplate Tomas 22:46, 14 Jun 2006 (EDT)

Categories

I was thinking that we need some new categories to make browsing the Wiki easier. Somehow I think we're going to get Linux syndrome instead of Wiki syndrome here. Everyone wants to create new content, no one wants to organize.

One article that should maybe become a category is Associate or Student. I think we should turn Student into the category because while an associate is a student, a student isn't necessarily an associate.

For what purpose? I mean -- what would be a member of category:associate? --Elizabeth Braidwood 19:10, 22 Jun 2006 (EDT)

Hmmm... I suppose on second thought that that catagory wouldn't be so nesicary, as there are only about 6 items in it Tomas 19:18, 22 Jun 2006 (EDT)

We should probably have some sort of overarching design to how things work. Tomas

Another category we might want to think about is SCA Jargon. For phrases like Dragon and Smalls. Tomas 21:09, 21 Jun 2006 (EDT)

We have category:glossary... I'd actually rather see a "(Jargon)" notation inside on the page. --Elizabeth Braidwood 19:10, 22 Jun 2006 (EDT)

(Jargon) notation it is. --Tomas 19:18, 22 Jun 2006 (EDT)

To help people search by the time periods or cultures of different personas, I've created subcategories of the People category for every culture and era that I have come across. I have gone through every page on the People list, and if the page specifically states a year or century, and/or a culture or country, I added an association to the subcategory or subcategories that the persona would belong to. At this point, it is going to be up to other people who edit their own pages to keep that ball in play. --Malkom1366, José Cabrera de Castilla

Locking Down the Main Page

Should we restrict access to the Main page, or leave it open? --Elizabeth Braidwood

I don't see why people other than the Moderators need access to the main page, are there any updates/changes that it would be benificial to have the main page open for? --Tomas 19:20, 22 Jun 2006 (EDT)

It's been an awfully long time since the main page's Featured Pages links were swapped out. Can we get some new links up there? --José Cabrera de Castilla 10:24, 22 Jun 2009 (PDT)

Aveloc R&D page

We know this is going to be a controversial issue, so I've gone ahead and asked Groa to write up her/Aveloc's side of the story. Does anyone have a recommendation as to who we should ask to write up the alternate view? In an ideal world, we'll be able to merge the two stories into a single article in a neutral voice. If that proves undoable, I propose we simply publish the two stories side-by-side and then stand back and carefully monitor any subsequent page changes.

As a starting point, I've created a personal page for Aveloc the Younger which contains pointers to an Aveloc R&D page as well as to pages for his two reigns.

--Elizabeth Braidwood 18:44, 3 Aug 2005 (EDT)

User identification

Do we want any kind of requirement that people create the accounts with their SCA names, and describe themselves on their user pages?

If we don't, I could envision "Joebob" coming along and editing some page, which gets reverted because nobody knows who they are, and it turns out to be some old duke that was putting in their own information. --Krenn

I think this is a terrific idea. Let's implement it as a community standard first. I'd rather not hardwire it into the site configuration unless necessary. --Elizabeth Braidwood 18:09, 29 Aug 2005 (EDT)

I have created an account with my SCA name, and have completed my user page. Now how do I add my name to the list of those on the Categories:People page and link to my userpage? --Aislinn O'Connor

Hi Aislinn and welcome! Add this tag to the bottom of your page: [[Category:People]] --Elizabeth Braidwood 13:51, 6 Nov 2006 (EST)

What goes where?

Thanks to everyone inovled in putting this together. I had thought about putting more of this kind of stuff on Cunnan but it feels better for a Kingdom to have its own. One thing I saw happen with Cunnan that I think would be good to think about early is how to not reinvent content that is elsewhere, or would make more sense elsewhere. E.g., I would propose that we promote a community standard that SCA level stuff that isn't specific to An Tir go on Cunnan, and that historical stuff go on Wikipedia. It is easy to link to a Wikipedia article, just put in [[wikipedia:chess]] for wikipedia:chess or [[wikipedia:chess|chess]] for chess. There doesn't seem to be a similar setup for Cunnan ... yet. So you would have to use [http://cunnan.sca.org.au/wiki/Chess chess] to link to chess. --IasonVorax 11:11, 30 Aug 2005 (EDT)

Interesting suggestion (re "SCA stuff that isn't specific to An Tir should go on Cunnan"). Cunnan is certainly extensive, but while exploring it I've found a definite Lochacian slant. If it were more generically SCA and more tolerant of differences in rite and language, I think I would be more interested. I can certainly get behind the proposal that historical stuff go on or be linked from Wikipedia. --Elizabeth Braidwood 23:21, 30 Aug 2005 (EDT)

I think much of that Lochac slant comes from the fact that they started it and were the bulk of the early contributors. Anyone who finds such a slant can fix it or mark it with {{rpov}} (the regional point of view tag). Otherwise if each Kingdome does its own version of how the SCA as a whole works, that will dilute a lot of energy 18 ways. Part of what makes Wikipedia a success is that it is very clear about what it is not. -- IasonVorax

It should be possible to implement our own quickwords. I'll poke around in the guts to see how to do it. --Krenn

I've been moving some of the more linked to things (canton, shire, etc) to links to Cunnan. I'm contemplating doing the same to the barony definition page as theirs is considerably more indepth. What do you think? -Tomas

Moving Old An Tir Handbook Material to Wiki?

I'm thinking that the old An Tir Handbook material that currently lives on the main An Tir website should be relocated to the wiki where it can be kept more up-to-date. That is, of course, if we can contact the original authors and get their permission to move their work to the public domain.

Whaddaya think?

Along those same lines, I'm wondering about the advisability of similarly moving/duplicating the Champions' List here to encourage ongoing maintenance. (I keep envisioning Sir Historic Fighter coming across the list late some night and noticing that the details aren't quite right. On the wiki, he'd be able to make the update. On the website he can't.) --Elizabeth Braidwood 16:02, 2 Sep 2005 (EDT)

I like the idea of using the wiki for maintenance items in general, but that list is a bad example. It's already fed from a backend program that culls the information from the OP database and generates the pages we see on the site. The practical upshot is that it's maintenance, like most of the OP site, is already trivial once the information itself is in the OP database. -- Quentin Martel

Yup, I realize that the page is fed from the OP database. Actually I was thinking of wiki-izing the Champions' lists in terms of using the wiki information to feed the OP. The Champion list is over 20 years out-of-date... hold on. It's in reverse chronological order. Okay, now it's not a wiki issue and this discussion should be taken elsewhere. --Elizabeth Braidwood 18:15, 2 Sep 2005 (EDT)

Admin request? Page deletion

I'm not sure where to request this, but the page Rivers Region could maybe be deleted as now there is a Rivers Region category in the Branch category instead. Wenyeva atte grene 00:18, 1 Dec 2005 (EST)

Done. Good point, we should create a "DeleteMe" tag... hold on, that sounds familiar. (It didn't pop up in my memory until I typed it.) Yup, we already have one, albeit really, really hidden -- sorry. See: Templates --Elizabeth Braidwood 16:15, 5 Dec 2005 (EST)

Ah, ok, cool. Thanks! -- Wenyeva atte grene 20:46, 5 Dec 2005 (EST)

ABC's

We are currently re-doing the Heavy Fighters portions of the ABC's and the changes will be radical. Although the stated purpose is to move a lot of the non-rules information out of the official document, there is information there that should be preserved.

I was wondering if someone who is much better at the wiki stuff would be willing to wiki-ize the current ABC's for posterity? --Sir Daniel 09:57, 23 Mar 2007 (PDT)

Yeah, I'd be willing to take that on -- assuming that the old ABCs are already in some ditital format. (I'll bet that if I looked on the An Tir website I would find them, right?) --Elizabeth Braidwood 13:10, 16 Apr 2007 (EDT)

After a little consideration (and a quick review of the ABC): Sir Dan, I think I'm going to need some guidance on this. Is the idea to take the non-rule information (that's been taken out of the ABC) and put it on the Wiki? That would imply that the rule information stays put in the ABC and should *not* be on the Wiki. So I'll have to wait until the new ABC is issued so I can compare it with the old. Unless you know someone on the ABC Update team who can feed me the stuff that's being taken out... --Elizabeth Braidwood 13:15, 18 Apr 2007 (EDT)

I'm sorry, I wasn't overly clear.

The new version will be radically different from the old version. I guess what I'm asking is the old version be saved

for posterity so that when the new version comes out we will have something to compare it to years from now.

--Sir Daniel 16:26, 27 Apr 2007 (EDT)

I'm thinking that if you're looking for a place to preserve an archival copy, perhaps a wiki (where things are easy to change) isn't the best place. Someone might take it upon themselves to (mistakenly) update the old version to the new version. I'm thinking dropping a copy on the An Tir website (boldly marked as an archival/old version). I suggest dropping a note to webteam@antir.sca.org. Someone there will be able to assist you. --Elizabeth Braidwood 14:53, 14 May 2007 (EDT)

Ah, OK I thought you could put pages in and 'lock them in' or somesuch. I'm still mostly wikillterate. Thanks! --Sir Daniel 22:04, 23 May 2007 (EDT)