Difference between revisions of "Talk:Warren War"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The names of each year's Warren War pages need to be changed to make them consistant with all the other recurring event page names -- the event number needs to be removed. --[[User:Braidwood|Elizabeth Braidwood]] 13:56, 13 Jul 2006 (EDT) | The names of each year's Warren War pages need to be changed to make them consistant with all the other recurring event page names -- the event number needs to be removed. --[[User:Braidwood|Elizabeth Braidwood]] 13:56, 13 Jul 2006 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :Why would this be the standard to not have event numbering? Speaking to Warren War directly, it's commonly referred to as Warren War V or Warren War VI in Shittimwoode. | ||
+ | |||
+ | :This would bring up the additional question of why it's necessary to have a standardized naming conventions for all events? I can see the argument that it may make naming of the wiki pages more consistant, but wiki already has practices in place to handle two pages getting different names. --[[User:Quentin|Quentin]] 09:39, 25 Jan 2007 (PST) |
Revision as of 17:39, 25 January 2007
The names of each year's Warren War pages need to be changed to make them consistant with all the other recurring event page names -- the event number needs to be removed. --Elizabeth Braidwood 13:56, 13 Jul 2006 (EDT)
- Why would this be the standard to not have event numbering? Speaking to Warren War directly, it's commonly referred to as Warren War V or Warren War VI in Shittimwoode.
- This would bring up the additional question of why it's necessary to have a standardized naming conventions for all events? I can see the argument that it may make naming of the wiki pages more consistant, but wiki already has practices in place to handle two pages getting different names. --Quentin 09:39, 25 Jan 2007 (PST)