Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Branch"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Moving query about branches here from Madrone:talk) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Alas, there is not. And only the panhandle of Idaho is part of An Tir. The rest of the state and all of Montana is part of... Artemisia? --[[User:Braidwood|Elizabeth Braidwood]] | Alas, there is not. And only the panhandle of Idaho is part of An Tir. The rest of the state and all of Montana is part of... Artemisia? --[[User:Braidwood|Elizabeth Braidwood]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | EB is once more correct. All of Montana, Utah and southern Idaho is [http://www.artemisia.sca.org/ Artemisia] Ralg (yet-another transplant from there) | ||
Revision as of 20:09, 3 November 2005
Under the "Subcatagories" heading, which consists of Principalities, there are some glaring holes in our kingdom. Is there not a Principality for the rest of Washington State? What about Idaho/Montana??
Alas, there is not. And only the panhandle of Idaho is part of An Tir. The rest of the state and all of Montana is part of... Artemisia? --Elizabeth Braidwood
EB is once more correct. All of Montana, Utah and southern Idaho is Artemisia Ralg (yet-another transplant from there)