Talk:Silver Pillar: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
It was supposed to be a bit of silliness to encourage cohesion among the Pillars. I'm not sure it's important enough to publish on the wiki. Although the existance of the Pillar e-mail list certainly is. --E.B. aka "Premier Pillar" :-) --[[User:Braidwood|Elizabeth Braidwood]] | It was supposed to be a bit of silliness to encourage cohesion among the Pillars. I'm not sure it's important enough to publish on the wiki. Although the existance of the Pillar e-mail list certainly is. --E.B. aka "Premier Pillar" :-) --[[User:Braidwood|Elizabeth Braidwood]] | ||
So this would be 'pillar talk'? [[User:Uilliam|Uilliam]] 21:41, 2 Aug 2006 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 17:41, 2 August 2006
User:Quentin wrote: "Members of the order are encouraged to choose a distinctive Pillar name for use in the order." to which User:Uilliam responds: "We are? First I've heard of it, or the email list."
Yep, I've maintained the e-mail list, although it is rarely used. And EB started the Pillar names when she became the premiere of the order. - Quentin Martel
It was supposed to be a bit of silliness to encourage cohesion among the Pillars. I'm not sure it's important enough to publish on the wiki. Although the existance of the Pillar e-mail list certainly is. --E.B. aka "Premier Pillar" :-) --Elizabeth Braidwood
So this would be 'pillar talk'? Uilliam 21:41, 2 Aug 2006 (EDT)