Talk:Aveloc R&D: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I was specifically asked to present Aveloc's side of it and gave a factual account in the original article. | I was specifically asked to present Aveloc's side of it and gave a factual account in the original article. | ||
| Line 16: | Line 9: | ||
:Unfortunately, that's not how Wikis work. This isn't "Aveloc's stance on the R&D". This is "the Aveloc R&D". --[[User:Krenn|Krenn]] 20:20, 22 Jan 2007 (PST) | :Unfortunately, that's not how Wikis work. This isn't "Aveloc's stance on the R&D". This is "the Aveloc R&D". --[[User:Krenn|Krenn]] 20:20, 22 Jan 2007 (PST) | ||
::EB specifically asked me to write up a bit about his story from his point of view that was fact based and put it here. I did that. | |||
::Once again, YOU all came to ME. Not the other way around... | |||
::~D [[User:Sir Daniel|Sir Daniel]] 08:57, 23 Jan 2007 (PST) | |||
:::Please follow wiki edit conventions - reply after, not before. I believe EB asked you to provide a ''starting point'', not an article that would be treated as a permanent, indelibly graven image, because that is not how Wikis work. They are collaborative documents, where everyone can edit - editors such as myself and EB act to remove biased or non-NPOV (neutral point of view) text. Please do not edit out other people's edits, as that will be construed as wiki vandalism. --[[User:Krenn|Krenn]] 18:45, 23 Jan 2007 (PST) | |||
Only the events and issues surrounding Aveloc's [[R&D]] should be described on the accompanying 'article' page. Other information about Aveloc should be added to the [[Aveloc the Younger]] page. | Only the events and issues surrounding Aveloc's [[R&D]] should be described on the accompanying 'article' page. Other information about Aveloc should be added to the [[Aveloc the Younger]] page. | ||
Revision as of 18:45, 23 January 2007
I was specifically asked to present Aveloc's side of it and gave a factual account in the original article.
Don't ask for my help and then change it. Aveloc signed off on my version, use it or delete the article.
~D
15:23, 22 Jan 2007 (PST)15:23, 22 Jan 2007 (PST)15:23, 22 Jan 2007 (PST)15:23, 22 Jan 2007 (PST)15:23, 22 Jan 2007 (PST)15:23, 22 Jan 2007 (PST)15:23, 22 Jan 2007 (PST)
- Unfortunately, that's not how Wikis work. This isn't "Aveloc's stance on the R&D". This is "the Aveloc R&D". --Krenn 20:20, 22 Jan 2007 (PST)
- EB specifically asked me to write up a bit about his story from his point of view that was fact based and put it here. I did that.
- Once again, YOU all came to ME. Not the other way around...
- ~D Sir Daniel 08:57, 23 Jan 2007 (PST)
- Please follow wiki edit conventions - reply after, not before. I believe EB asked you to provide a starting point, not an article that would be treated as a permanent, indelibly graven image, because that is not how Wikis work. They are collaborative documents, where everyone can edit - editors such as myself and EB act to remove biased or non-NPOV (neutral point of view) text. Please do not edit out other people's edits, as that will be construed as wiki vandalism. --Krenn 18:45, 23 Jan 2007 (PST)
Only the events and issues surrounding Aveloc's R&D should be described on the accompanying 'article' page. Other information about Aveloc should be added to the Aveloc the Younger page.
This was and continues to be a hot issue. Please observe the following guidelines when adding content to or editing this article:
- Keep it positive. Keep personal bias out of articles you write or edit. If you're writing or editing an article on a controversial subject, include opinions from all sides of the debate. If you don't feel capable of writing from the opposing view, include an invitation for someone else to contribution that part.
- Keep it positive. Apart from Event Memories, pages should be written neutrally and without personality.
- Keep it positive. Don't get bent out of shape if someone edits "your" page. It's not your page. With a few very minor exceptions, all pages belong to all An Tirians.
- Keep it positive. If an issue hasn't been dealt with fully in your opinion, don't assume your needs are being ignored. Assume instead that we've been waiting for your input.
I added the line about King Thorin affirming his awards. I'm not sure if it belongs in this article or in Aveloc's personal page, but since an R&D often is followed by the removal of awards and the possibility of the removal of his awards is directly related to the R&D, I listed it here. My source for this is e-mail that I sent during my term as Dexter Gauntlet to King Thorin and the orders he sent to me. --Quentin 16:32, 23 Jan 2007 (PST)