Aveloc R&D: Difference between revisions

From An Tir Culture Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Beweave (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
rv biased edits - try to keep this NPOV, please. Facts, not feelings.
Line 3: Line 3:
(Please read the 'discussion' tab before adding or editing information here.)
(Please read the 'discussion' tab before adding or editing information here.)


* [[Aveloc the Younger]]'s modern name is Harvey Palmer
* [[Aveloc the Younger]]'s modern name is Harvey Palmer.


* According to the [http://www.sca.org/BOD/minutes/2002/2002-10-19-qm.pdf Board Minutes of Oct 2002], his R&D was issued at the January 2002 Board meeting. (At the time of writing the January 2002 Board Minutes were not available online.)
* According to the [http://www.sca.org/BOD/minutes/2002/2002-10-19-qm.pdf Board Minutes of Oct 2002], his R&D was issued at the January 2002 Board meeting. (At the time of writing the January 2002 Board Minutes were not available online.)


*Possibly the only R&D ever instigated and carried out soley at the [[Corporate]] level. The [[Crown]] and Kingdom of An Tir did not officially ever call for an R&D. While this may not have been started by the crown or been official, it was indeed approved of by many card carrying An Tirians.  This was not done in secret and many wrote letters requesting that the BOD continue the investigation and act accordingly.
* Possibly the only R&D ever instigated and carried out soley at the [[Corporate]] level - the [[Crown]] and Kingdom of An Tir did not officially ever call for an R&D.


*Many people within An Tir still believe the R&D was driven by personal interests. No official list of reasons have ever been given by the [[Corporation]] regading this R&D. There was a nebulous list of 14 'Charges' initially given by the Corporation. But although many were factually proven to be either incorrect or fabricated, no final list of charges was ever given to Aveloc about which charges were found to be with merit.  And many don't.
* No official list of reasons have ever been given by the [[Corporation]] regarding this R&D. There was a list of 14 'Charges' initially given by the Corporation which are either disputed by Aveloc's supporters, or claimed to have been proven incorrect or fabricated.
 
*After exhasting all avenues within the Corporation, a mundane lawsuit was eventually filed that attempted to force the [[Society]] to repeal the R&D. The case was dropped, and although the SCA paid Aveloc's legal fees as well as additional compensation, neither party admitted fault.
 
*There is still some hope by the people who care for Aveloc that the BoD will re-visit the R&D and consider re-instatment. This hope is not held by all but is in fact quite the opposite.


* After exhausting all avenues within the Corporation, a mundane lawsuit was eventually filed that attempted to force the [[Society]] to repeal the R&D. The case was dropped, and although the SCA paid Aveloc's legal fees as well as additional compensation, neither party admitted fault.


* This issue remains one of contention.


[[Category:Culture]]
[[Category:Culture]]

Revision as of 21:45, 17 November 2006

See also: Revocation and Denial of Membership

(Please read the 'discussion' tab before adding or editing information here.)

  • According to the Board Minutes of Oct 2002, his R&D was issued at the January 2002 Board meeting. (At the time of writing the January 2002 Board Minutes were not available online.)
  • Possibly the only R&D ever instigated and carried out soley at the Corporate level - the Crown and Kingdom of An Tir did not officially ever call for an R&D.
  • No official list of reasons have ever been given by the Corporation regarding this R&D. There was a list of 14 'Charges' initially given by the Corporation which are either disputed by Aveloc's supporters, or claimed to have been proven incorrect or fabricated.
  • After exhausting all avenues within the Corporation, a mundane lawsuit was eventually filed that attempted to force the Society to repeal the R&D. The case was dropped, and although the SCA paid Aveloc's legal fees as well as additional compensation, neither party admitted fault.
  • This issue remains one of contention.