Talk:Rivers Region: Difference between revisions
→"Region" added: redirect? |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I agree "Rivers Region" is a better name. "Western Region" is a good historical reference as well. --[[User:Braidwood|Elizabeth Braidwood]] 20:13, 5 Dec 2005 (EST) | I agree "Rivers Region" is a better name. "Western Region" is a good historical reference as well. --[[User:Braidwood|Elizabeth Braidwood]] 20:13, 5 Dec 2005 (EST) | ||
:Now that there's a Category for Rivers Region -- should we make this page just redirect to the category? It would be good to leave the page here so that links to | :Now that there's a Category for Rivers Region -- should we make this page just redirect to the category? It would be good to leave the page here so that links to Rivers Region would still work, but they'd redir to the category that is more useful. -- [[User:Wenyeva|Wenyeva atte grene]] 20:49, 5 Dec 2005 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 09:32, 14 January 2009
"Region" added
Hello,
I changed the page to Rivers Region from Rivers because I generally heard the regions with the word "Region" tacked on... "They are in Rivers Region" not "They are in Rivers." As I am up here in Western Region, though, maybe the usage is different down there. It can be changed back easily if people think it's necessary. Right now there's a redirect so if you link to Rivers it will take you through to Rivers Region, so nothing is broken. Wenyeva atte grene 23:39, 30 Nov 2005 (EST)
In retrospect, I think it's possible that Rivers (Region) would be a better page name. Then I can make a Western (Region) too, etc. Any comments on this? Wenyeva atte grene 23:50, 30 Nov 2005 (EST)
I agree "Rivers Region" is a better name. "Western Region" is a good historical reference as well. --Elizabeth Braidwood 20:13, 5 Dec 2005 (EST)
- Now that there's a Category for Rivers Region -- should we make this page just redirect to the category? It would be good to leave the page here so that links to Rivers Region would still work, but they'd redir to the category that is more useful. -- Wenyeva atte grene 20:49, 5 Dec 2005 (EST)