Talk:Warren War: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:This would bring up the additional question of why it's necessary to have a standardized naming conventions for all events? I can see the argument that it may make naming of the wiki pages more consistant, but wiki already has practices in place to handle two pages getting different names. --[[User:Quentin|Quentin]] 09:39, 25 Jan 2007 (PST) | :This would bring up the additional question of why it's necessary to have a standardized naming conventions for all events? I can see the argument that it may make naming of the wiki pages more consistant, but wiki already has practices in place to handle two pages getting different names. --[[User:Quentin|Quentin]] 09:39, 25 Jan 2007 (PST) | ||
::Yeah, okay. I must've been experiencing extreme tunnel-vision back then, sorry. I think "Warren War V AS/CD" looks fine now. --[[User:Braidwood|Elizabeth Braidwood]] 19:06, 28 Jan 2007 (PST) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:06, 28 January 2007
The names of each year's Warren War pages need to be changed to make them consistant with all the other recurring event page names -- the event number needs to be removed. --Elizabeth Braidwood 13:56, 13 Jul 2006 (EDT)
- Why would this be the standard to not have event numbering? Speaking to Warren War directly, it's commonly referred to as Warren War V or Warren War VI in Shittimwoode.
- This would bring up the additional question of why it's necessary to have a standardized naming conventions for all events? I can see the argument that it may make naming of the wiki pages more consistant, but wiki already has practices in place to handle two pages getting different names. --Quentin 09:39, 25 Jan 2007 (PST)
- Yeah, okay. I must've been experiencing extreme tunnel-vision back then, sorry. I think "Warren War V AS/CD" looks fine now. --Elizabeth Braidwood 19:06, 28 Jan 2007 (PST)