Difference between revisions of "User talk:Malkom1366"

From An Tir Culturewiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
''Thankyouthankyouthankyou for starting to use the location category! I thought it would be a good addition to the wiki and no one before you has come along to add any sites in parts of the kingdom I don't know about. --José Cabrera de Castilla 16:30, 23 Jan 2009 (PST)  P.S.: Do you think subcategories for the different regions and principalities might be a good addition so that people can find sites close to them? That way people could say "hey, I'm thinking of running an event, what sites can I hold my event at?" and then look up sites that events have been held at near them. That was kind of my goal for creating a location category''
+
''Well, how about these ideas: [[Category:Portland Area Sites]], [[Category:Oregon Sites]], [[Category:Rivers Region Sites]], [[Category:Tir Righ Sites]]. How specific do you think it should get? In terms of indexing, it would be best to be as specific as possible, but there are others who get irritable about over-categorization. (Not that I know why; it's not like it hurts them and they aren't obliged to use them.)''  
  
−
We'll have to figure that out... we can't use the same region designators as we did for Branches can we? I think it's a great idea.
+
That's a good idea.  Could even have overlapping ones that way so people can start with a small area search and if nothing works go larger. So say something in Portland could be in all three that you listed. Could go with the basic regions in the regions category, then add others that seem reasonable.  --[[User:Phelan Tolusmidr|Phelan Tolusmidr]] 19:00, 23 Jan 2009 (PST)
−
--[[User:Phelan Tolusmidr|Phelan Tolusmidr]] 18:06, 23 Jan 2009 (PST)
 

Revision as of 03:00, 24 January 2009

Well, how about these ideas:,,,. How specific do you think it should get? In terms of indexing, it would be best to be as specific as possible, but there are others who get irritable about over-categorization. (Not that I know why; it's not like it hurts them and they aren't obliged to use them.)

That's a good idea. Could even have overlapping ones that way so people can start with a small area search and if nothing works go larger. So say something in Portland could be in all three that you listed. Could go with the basic regions in the regions category, then add others that seem reasonable. --Phelan Tolusmidr 19:00, 23 Jan 2009 (PST)

Retrieved from "https://antir.sca.wiki//index.php?title=User_talk:Malkom1366&oldid=16139"