Difference between revisions of "Talk:Elizabeth Braidwood"
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
RE: The Ships category, the discussion was that Ships are nautical themed households, and we have a household category. Nothing against ships, more against having different household categories (Clans, Ships, Units, Orders, etc) when they aren't functionally different. --[[User:Michelino di Gino Martini|Michelino di Gino Martini]] 22:39, 20 Apr 2007 (EDT) | RE: The Ships category, the discussion was that Ships are nautical themed households, and we have a household category. Nothing against ships, more against having different household categories (Clans, Ships, Units, Orders, etc) when they aren't functionally different. --[[User:Michelino di Gino Martini|Michelino di Gino Martini]] 22:39, 20 Apr 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
Alright that makes sense and I can understand the reasoning behind it. I just never had looked in it that light before. | Alright that makes sense and I can understand the reasoning behind it. I just never had looked in it that light before. | ||
| − | Thanks [[Marin Gorislav]] | + | Thanks [[Marin Gorislav]] 00:00, 20 Apr 2007 (PST) |
Revision as of 07:00, 21 April 2007
I can certainly add more to Hawkshaven when time permits me to do so. I am currently rather busy with work and looking for a place to live. Also out of curiosity why did you have the Ships category removed? They are a rather large part of the society and I figured they should be included. I would just like to know why this action has been taken and I mean no disrespect.
Also any suggestions on how to build my persona page with a bit more skill would also be appreciated. I am rather new to the editing and language of Wiki's in general.
Thanks again,
RE: The Ships category, the discussion was that Ships are nautical themed households, and we have a household category. Nothing against ships, more against having different household categories (Clans, Ships, Units, Orders, etc) when they aren't functionally different. --Michelino di Gino Martini 22:39, 20 Apr 2007 (EDT)
Alright that makes sense and I can understand the reasoning behind it. I just never had looked in it that light before.
Thanks Marin Gorislav 00:00, 20 Apr 2007 (PST)